INFINITE UPSIDE

Accuracy and the moment

Make the correction useful in the room

The fact matters. So does what the listener needs to do with it now.

A correction is useful when it reaches the person who needs it in time to change what happens. Being right about the fact is necessary. It leaves another question: how should this person receive it, in this conversation?

In Chapter 2 of Infinite Upside, Vijay Sheth describes learning to consider the moment as well as the content of a correction. The same point can help, distract or embarrass depending on how it is made. Accuracy remains the purpose; the way it enters the conversation affects whether anyone can use it.

When the decision is still open

Imagine an invented neighborhood choir planning transport to a performance. During a meeting, its organizer says the venue opens for setup at 4 p.m. The group is about to confirm a vehicle collection that relies on entering then.

A member, Sam, has a message from the venue giving 5 p.m. as the access time for this performance. Waiting until after the vehicle is confirmed would leave the plan relying on a disputed hour. This is a reason to raise the point now.

Sam can keep the intervention close to the decision: the venue message says 5 p.m.; they should check the access time before confirming collection. The group needs the date, the source and the consequence. It does not need an opening argument about the organizer's attention to detail.

The organizer may have a later message or an arrangement Sam has not seen. Sam should identify which message they are using, rather than present possession of one document as proof that nobody else can know more. If the organizer has a current confirmation for 4 p.m., that changes the finding.

If 5 p.m. is confirmed, the group can examine another collection time or a way to wait with the equipment. Neither is automatically workable. The correction has located the problem before a commitment; the transport arrangement still needs finishing.

A different moment for the same fact

Now change the setting. The performance is over. Transport worked under the final confirmed plan. At a social dinner, the organizer recalls that the original access time was 4 p.m. Sam remembers the earlier message differently.

No one is about to book a vehicle, publish an account or rely on that detail. Sam can let the story continue and ask about the message later if it matters. Interrupting the dinner to establish the sequence may add little to what anyone needs that evening.

That judgment changes if the story is being used to plan the next performance, explain a disputed charge or assign responsibility for a delay. The fact now has a job again. Ask what would follow from leaving it uncorrected, rather than use a fixed rule that corrections should always be immediate or always private.

The distinction is not between caring about accuracy and being agreeable. It concerns the use of this fact at this moment. A minor detail in a finished story can become consequential when someone starts planning around it.

Correct the claim without inventing a motive

A wrong time does not establish why someone gave it. The organizer could be remembering an older arrangement, reading another date or making an ordinary mistake. Sam can identify the difference without supplying a theory about carelessness or dishonesty.

Equally, a polite correction should not become so vague that the point disappears. Saying there may be a small timing question is less useful than identifying the 4 p.m. and 5 p.m. difference before collection is confirmed. Plain language can leave room for another source without hiding the disagreement.

If the organizer becomes embarrassed, Sam can return to the common job: establish when the choir can enter and arrange transport that works. A private conversation afterward might help with a recurring difficulty. It would serve a different purpose from resolving the access time in the meeting.

Before correcting an ordinary factual claim, ask what decision depends on it, how sure you are of the source and what the listener needs to understand. Then make the point at the scale the job requires. The group should leave knowing which time it can use.

Read alongside the book

Chapter 2, What My Family Gave Me.

Original commentary and discussion material. Read the full personal accounts in Infinite Upside: Building Wealth With Room to Live, by Vijay Sheth.

Find your edition · Chapter companion

Read the chapter behind the conversation

Chapter 2: What My Family Gave Me

ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTOR

Luna Lim

DIRECTOR OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH & EDITORIAL STRATEGY

SHETH CAPITAL, INC.

Luna Lim writes about business, investing, and the judgment behind financial decisions. She joined PCH Exotics Inc. as Director of Operations in 2022, working across La Jolla and Miami. Today, she reports directly to Vijay Sheth at Sheth Capital, Inc., bringing an operator’s perspective to the ideas she covers.

Based in Pacific Beach, California, Luna is curious about the people behind the numbers: what they’re building, how they weigh uncertainty, and what makes a risk worth taking. Her articles for Infinite Upside follow those questions through the details, with clear explanations and a feel for how decisions play out in everyday business.

More from Luna Lim

The Infinite Upside store